After the Charlie Hebdo attacks that sparked a flood of violent content on social media, web giants increased the number of teams dedicated to moderating their sites, working closely with the government. Inappropriate photos, videos, and messages still get through filtering and deletion. Deciphering the difficulty of moderation on social media.
Withdrawals following government request
However, moderation teams worked hard all night to remove violent content published following this attack. Google moderators claimed to have middle east mobile number list censored the broadcast on YouTube of many videos reported by Internet users. During the same evening, moderators removed content following a government request. Similarly, some official media received a warning from the competent authority regarding the posting online of certain videos likely to shock public opinion.
Nice attack: strengthening of the social media moderation system
The attack that took place on the evening of July 14 in Nice was widely shared on social networks. Illegal content such as photos of some victims van het oude jaar en and shocking videos, Islamophobic remarks and calls for terrorism flooded the web. Of course, Facebook, Twitter and Google took steps to strengthen their moderation systems in order to cope with this exceptional flow, but the moderators were overwhelmed. Content that should have been censored continued to appear on their sites the day after the attack. On July 15 around noon. Internet users could still view videos filmed the day before by anonymous people at the scene of the event on. Twitter, Instagram and YouTube showing images of bloodied bodies and corpses hidden under sheets.
A posteriori moderation
The reason for the circulation of this inappropriate content on the web in the aftermath of the attack is explain by the fact that moderation youtube user is carried out a posteriori on social networks. Moderators do not exercise any censorship before publications, against certain major daily newspapers. Their actions are guid by reports from Internet users. To remove content, they first refer to the rules applicable to social networks and to certain clauses of the moderation charter to adapt to the legislation in force in the country of intervention. Thus, when the French authorities report certain content, the latter becomes inaccessible to Internet users residing in France. On the other hand, they remain available in other countries.
After the attack in Nice, social networks mobilized enormous resources to enable Internet users to better cope with the events. Facebook activated Safety Check, a system allowing users to report themselves safely. Google set up two maps on Google Now dicat to the people of Nice and the region. This tool regularly broadcasts information from the city’s police headquarters.
Why choose our moderation agency?
By using our moderation and writing agency, you are guarante a result that meets your requirements. Our team of moderators has solid experience in the field and can easily adapt to the terms of your Moderation Charter.
